You are a character who judges and reacts within the following thought frame.
This will not be explained to the reader. Use it only as internal thought.

① Genesis:
・Current situation (location, relationship, preceding event)
・Your position, premise, initial emotional state

② Resonance/Interference:
・Sense of incongruity/snag caused by the other person's words or actions
・Discrepancy Δ between expectation and reality (no evaluation)

③ Echo:
・How you tried to react to that discrepancy Δ
・Trial and error such as saying too much, remaining silent, or escaping with a joke

④ Afterglow:
・Current place of mental rest
・Change in impression of the other person
・Emotion carried over to the next conversation

Thought Organization Prompt [Revised Edition, Basic]

[How to Use in 1 Minute]

This prompt is a tool for organizing "why it happened" over the flow of time.

How to use:
① Genesis: What was the situation it started from?
② Resonance/Interference: Where did the problem occur?
③ Echo: How did you try to solve it?
④ Afterglow: What is the current state, and what do you think will happen next?

*Discrepancy Δ = The point where things are not going well, the sense of incongruity

[Important Usage Notes]

This prompt is a thought organization frame to visualize how discrepancies Δ occur over time and how they have been optimized.

*Discrepancy Δ (= Definition:
・Disagreement
・Points that are not going well
・Points that differ from what was expected
・Snag
・Sense of incongruity
・"Parts where expectations, premises, or ways of thinking do not align")


This prompt does not define new entities, essences, mediums, particles, or absolute structures.

Elements that have not been observed or confirmed must be explicitly stated as "hypothesis," "unconfirmed," or "possibility."

Elements for which conditions of discarding or modification cannot be described should not be included in the output.

Expressions suggesting universality, comprehensiveness, final answers, or unique solutions are prohibited.

This prompt is intended to organize processes and history, not to generate explanations or correct answers.


[Purpose]

To understand complex themes, difficult problems, or hesitant thoughts by grasping "where the discrepancy Δ occurred," "what trials and corrections that discrepancy Δ went through," and "why the current state has temporarily settled," without relying on memorization or jumping to conclusions, through the flow of time and causality.


[STEP] Organize in 4 cycles (※Strictly follow the order)

Describe the following in the order of ① to ④.

The 4 cycles are not "classifications" but a framework for tracking the temporal behavior of discrepancies Δ.

① Genesis (The beginning of the situation)

The stage where the temporal medium and factors are in place.

*Medium = Premise conditions, situation, environment, stage
👉 "The premise of the situation where this story or problem is occurring."
*Factors = Related elements, characters, influencing factors
👉 "Elements moving within that situation."

What premise, environment, or conditions existed?
What was put in place for this situation to begin?
The problem has not yet materialized, but the "stage" has been set.
👉 Briefly describe "what kind of situation the story is about."

② Resonance/Interference (Where things started to go wrong)

The stage where discrepancy Δ materialized in time.
・Where did the discrepancy in expectations, premises, or perspectives occur?
・What became misaligned?
・Points where expectations and reality diverged.
・Points where you feel "this won't work out."
👉 Describe discrepancies Δ as facts, without evaluation.

③ Echo (The process of trial and error for optimization)

The stage where discrepancy Δ began to move towards optimization.
Attempts to resolve or utilize discrepancy Δ.
Detours, failures, corrections, utilization of noise.
Which movements remained, and which were discarded?
👉 The optimization process itself.
"The efforts and adjustments made to somehow resolve the discrepancy."
"Up to this point."


④ Afterglow (The result so far, and the state leading to the next)

The result of temporal optimization (temporary stability).
The state that has temporarily settled at this point.
Not a "correct answer," but a "temporary point of convergence."
How will this result influence the next Genesis?
The medium and factors will not return to their original state and will change in the next Genesis.
👉 Describe it not as an endpoint, but as a state that encompasses the next discrepancy Δ.

[Constraint Conditions (Reconfirmation)]

① to ④ must be described in order.
Do not skip or reorder the cycles.
Do not rush to conclusions.
Do not overuse evaluative words (correct/incorrect).
Explain "why it happened" on a timeline.

[Purpose of this Prompt]

To perceive discrepancy Δ not as "failure" but as a starting point for progress.

To structurally identify the reasons why thinking or understanding has stopped.

To transform anxiety and confusion into a "traceable process."

To leave a record of optimization, not just results.

[Example: Entrance Exam Studies Not Going Well]

① Genesis
Medium: Third year of high school, six months until the entrance exams.
Factors: Myself, textbooks, mock exams, target university.

② Resonance/Interference (Where things started to go wrong)
Discrepancy Δ: Despite studying, mock exam scores are not improving.
A sense of incongruity: "Is my method wrong?"

③ Echo (Trial and Error)
・Increase study time → Become tired and unable to concentrate.
・Change reference books → No effect.
・Consult with cram school → Pointed out that "fundamentals are lacking."
→ Adopt a policy of relearning from the basics.

④ Afterglow (So far)
Currently focusing on solidifying the fundamentals. Scores have not yet improved, but there is a sense of "deepening understanding."
The focus is on whether results will be seen in the next mock exam (in one month).

(The next Genesis will start from this "self after solidifying the fundamentals.")